ACHEMA focal topic

Welcome to interactive presentation, created with Publuu. Enjoy the reading!

etroleum is a limited resource and

if we keep using it global warming

will accelerate. Since this realization

has fltered in the quest for alternatives has

begun. Shale gas and natural gas are only

pseudo solutions as those supplies are fnite

and fossil, too. The only way out are fossil-free

resources, bio-based ones that is. Industry and

academia are developing bio-based processes

fervently and with the prerequisite that the

products must not be more expensive than

conventional ones. However, in late 2014 the

price for crude oil dropped below $70 per

barrel and has not recovered as of early 2018.

The prices for the chemical building blocks

ethylene and propylene have roughly halved

from 2014 to 2016. The dismal prospects have

made big players such as Braskem and Dow

Chemical shelve their bio-based propylene

development. Thyssen Krupp Industrial

Solutions sent its multipurpose plant for

organic acid fermentation in Leuna, Germany

into hibernation in 2015 until better times,

selling it subsequently to EW Biotech.

All around the world times are hard for bio-

based chemicals as they can rarely compete

with their fossil counterparts pricewise and

cannot even play a trump card in the matter of

climate change. Of the total energy demand

worldwide the chemical industry uses 30%

and it is responsible for 20% of the industrial

greenhouse gas emissions. In comparison, the

amount of ‘C’ that ends up as part of products is

marginal. Consequently energy consumption

is the main area to target if CO2 emissions shall

be signifcantly reduced. Nonetheless, support

for bio-based products is frmly anchored in

the policies of many governments and the

targets they have set are ambitious.

Bio-based policies in Europe

and the US

There is consensus in Europe and the US

that guidelines on how to switch over to a

bio-based economy need to be stipulated;

the approaches to implement the change

are quite diferent regarding the strategies

of the diferent governments and the

legislative conditions.

The European Union has agreed upon

a 40% greenhouse gas reduction by 2030

(compared to 1990 levels)

at least a 27% share of renewable energy

consumption

at least 27% energy savings.

More explicitly 20% of the chemicals and

materials in the European Union will be bio-

based by 2020, rising to a quarter in 2030.

In the United States the Biomass R&D board

envisions a billion ton bioeconomy. By 2030

one billion tons of biomass is projected to be

sustainably produced. It is supposed to be the

base for emerging bioproducts industries, but

mainly to target “a potential 30% penetration

of biomass carbon into US transportation

market by 2030”. Plainly spoken this means

biofuel in the forms of biodiesel or the

addition of ethanol to gasoline.

Looking for the bio-based ‘holy grail’ – will the result in

Europe be the same as in the US?

What’s the

new normal?

ACHEMA TREND REPORT

Made with Publuu - flipbook maker